Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /storage/content/49/145849/famitracker.com/public_html/forum/classes/dbHandler.php on line 29
FamiTracker
Normally, pitch macro values act as relative values (each value is added/subtracted from the previous value). However, when you use an arpeggio macro, pitch values act as absolute values (each value is added/subtracted from zero) until the arpeggio macro ends (unless it's looped). Observing the instruments in the FTM below should give you a better idea of what I mean.
Does it make a difference whether the arpeggio macro is defined as absolute or relative?
_______________________
Where to find me:
YouTube: [url=http://youtube.com/user/stratelier]http://youtube.com/user/stratelier
DeviantArt: [url=http://stratadrake.deviantart.com/]http://stratadrake.deviantart.com/
I believe it's intentional. I can't remember why but it had something to do with the calculation of the pitch. It's also why pitch bends don't work when you use an instrument with an arpeggio macro. You probably should ask Slimeball or rainwarrior about this.
_______________________
Ponies, Mega Man, Meshuggah, Rotten Sound and ice-cream! <3
[url=http://www.youtube.com/user/seppowarheart]YOUTUBE
This happens because the arpeggio macro is overwriting the pitch value for each new note, which resets the previous pitch macro values.
It is sort of intentional, but would probably be possible to "fix" by storing the accumulated pitch values separately. I'm unsure if that would be useful though, other than making it a bit more intuitive.
[quote=za909]absolute macros are way easier for me to use than relative ones.[/quote]
It really just depends on the situation and preference. I've found relative macros to be easier used when it comes to percussion... sometimes...
_______________________
Ponies, Mega Man, Meshuggah, Rotten Sound and ice-cream! <3
[url=http://www.youtube.com/user/seppowarheart]YOUTUBE
