Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /storage/content/49/145849/famitracker.com/public_html/forum/classes/dbHandler.php on line 29 FamiTracker
Login:
Menu:
Post: Author:
FamiTracker > General > FamiTracker Talk > Need Advice on Wave Looping With N163 Owner: Thom New post
Page 1 of 1 Sort:  
Need Advice on Wave Looping With N163 Posted: 2012-10-09 21:29 Reply | Quote
Thom

Avatar

Member for: 4529 days
Status: Offline

#40365
I'm having a little trouble with switiching wave forms without having any poping sound.

Posted: 2012-10-10 03:39 Reply | Quote
B00daW

Avatar

Member for: 4986 days
Status: Offline

#40376
First off, do you understand what creates pops or clipping? Once you understand that, it's easy.

Secondly, I believe there is a secret registry function in FamiTracker v4+ that makes N163 less noisier. Which brings me to the question, are you talking about FamiTracker or NSF exports?

Posted: 2012-10-10 04:07 Reply | Quote
Thom

Avatar

Member for: 4529 days
Status: Offline

#40377
Well, I have little luck with looping sample beyond simple sound waves. So, lets get to a example of 8 samples long wave. Five of them complets one single wav(40 samples long). How should I number them in wave settings? Like this: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4? To your second question, right now I'm only focused on Famitracker.

Posted: 2012-10-10 04:43 Reply | Quote
Raijin

Avatar

Member for: 4123 days
Status: Offline

#40378
Just upload an example ftm. Best way to help is to be able to see exactly what the problem is. With you just explaining, it is vague and I am not sure how to help.

_______________________
[url=http://www.youtube.com/user/ChiptunedRaijin]Youtube Channel
Posted: 2012-10-10 07:20 Reply | Quote
za909

Avatar

Member for: 3962 days
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline

#40379
Oh I guess you're trying to use longer waves by connecting multiple ones? That's not really going to work since 60Hz (or 50 in PAL) is way too slow for changing the wave just as it completes one cycle.

_______________________
Rectangular sh*t ©
Posted: 2012-10-10 17:32  (Last Edited: 2012-10-10 17:33) Reply | Quote
DjJizzer5

Avatar

Member for: 3937 days
Status: Offline

#40383
i was curious myself - what is the Hz to make 32 sized wave changing instantenous in one step to another wave?

Posted: 2012-10-10 17:50 Reply | Quote
za909

Avatar

Member for: 3962 days
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline

#40385
Well it would depend on the note's frequency...so in order to truly achieve that, you'd have to change engine speed for every note.

_______________________
Rectangular sh*t ©
Posted: 2012-10-10 18:12 Reply | Quote
Thom

Avatar

Member for: 4529 days
Status: Offline

#40386
[quote=za909]Well it would depend on the note's frequency...so in order to truly achieve that, you'd have to change engine speed for every note.[/quote]

I guess I'm stuck with using 1 or 2 large waves at a time and/or shorther samples.

Posted: 2012-10-10 18:47  (Last Edited: 2012-10-10 18:49) Reply | Quote
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 4983 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#40387
[quote=DjJizzer5]i was curious myself - what is the Hz to make 32 sized wave changing instantenous in one step to another wave?[/quote]
From what I've gathered, 311 Hz and D#4 seems to be the optimal combination.

_______________________
Follow me on [url=https://twitter.com/jrlepage2a03]Twitter.
I record (some) NSFs on hardware. Feel free to [url=http://www.famitracker.com/forum/posts.php?id=3633]request a hardware render.
Page 1 of 1 Sort: