Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /storage/content/49/145849/famitracker.com/public_html/forum/classes/dbHandler.php on line 29 FamiTracker
Login:
Menu:
Post: Author:
FamiTracker > General > Bug Reports & Feature Requests > Feature request: N163 fine-pitch effect Owner: MovieMovies1 New post
Page 1 of 1 Sort:  
Feature request: N163 fine-pitch effect Posted: 2012-09-11 09:09  (Last Edited: 2012-09-11 09:10) Reply | Quote
MovieMovies1

Avatar

Member for: 4373 days
Location: Norway
Status: Offline

#39360
I would like to request an effect that offsets the pitch by one point instead of more in the n163. this way, i could have used an effect like that insteadof using 2 instruments on the N163 as in the example.


Attachments:
phasing.ftm (2 Kb)
Posted: 2012-09-11 15:47 Reply | Quote
za909

Avatar

Member for: 3962 days
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline

#39374
Wow, I never actually knew that P81 isn't the same as putting 1 in the pitch macrof ro the N163.

_______________________
Rectangular sh*t ©
Posted: 2012-09-11 22:24 Reply | Quote
jsr
Administrator

Avatar

Member for: 5924 days
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline

#39386
The plan is to add an effect to allow customizing the strength of Pxx and pitch slide effects. It's fixed right now to provide a compromise between using few and many channels (as the strength depends on that), but unfortunately it's a bit too much for less channels.

_______________________
Programmer and developer
Posted: 2012-09-15 06:20 Reply | Quote
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 4983 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#39543
Shouldn't it be optimised for fewer channels though, considering that "we shouldn't use more than 6 channels" and everything? :p

Anyway, I think going the MIDI way with separate effects for fine- and coarse-tuning (a la MIDI RPN) would be an interesting thing to consider. Would Oxx work as a coarse tuning effect? And I suppose whichever is further right in the FX columns would take precedence.

_______________________
Follow me on [url=https://twitter.com/jrlepage2a03]Twitter.
I record (some) NSFs on hardware. Feel free to [url=http://www.famitracker.com/forum/posts.php?id=3633]request a hardware render.
Posted: 2012-09-15 07:02  (Last Edited: 2012-09-15 07:11) Reply | Quote
rainwarrior

Avatar

Member for: 4150 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#39548
There's no precedence in the midi coarse/fine tuning. Coarse tuning is the high bits, fine tuning is the low bits. You use them both together to get the full range of accuracy available.

N163's frequency registers are only 18 bits anyway. 16 bits of tuning accuracy via two separate effects like this entirely adequate.

I think that would be more effective than controlling the strength of Pxx. It would allow you to specify very precisely what frequency you need (which a Pxx multiplier control would not) and it would have the same number of effects anyway.

1xx/2xx/Gxx, on the other hand, don't have any inherent expectation of precision and have a wide range (0-256)... hopefully you could find a single scale for them that would allow operation in a lot of ranges? Maybe that's not possible though.

Posted: 2012-09-15 08:48 Reply | Quote
jsr
Administrator

Avatar

Member for: 5924 days
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline

#39555
It's entirely up to you to choose how many channels you should use. All I do is to ensure it sounds as close to the real hardware as possible.

And I think rainwarrior clarified the problem, the frequency registers for N163 is 18 bits, so controlling the last 8 bits alone wouldn't make much difference. The 2A03 registers are only 11 bits on the other hand.

_______________________
Programmer and developer
Page 1 of 1 Sort: