Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /storage/content/49/145849/famitracker.com/public_html/forum/classes/dbHandler.php on line 29 FamiTracker
Login:
Menu:
Post: Author:
FamiTracker > General > Bug Reports & Feature Requests > Should NSF import be a feature in FamiTracker? Owner: jrlepage New Post(Locked)
Page 1 of 2 Sort: Goto Page: [1] [2] Next >>
Do you think it would be a good idea to implement a feature that allows one to import any NSF file in Famitracker?
Yes, it should be made a feature in a future release of Famitracker.
58% ( 45 )
Yes, but it should be made as an external application instead.
30% ( 23 )
No, I do not think this is a priority for now.
12% ( 9 )

Total votes: 77
Should NSF import be a feature in FamiTracker? Posted: 2011-07-03 01:40 Reply(Locked)
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 4982 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#19315
Poll

Posted: 2011-07-03 01:40  (Last Edited: 2011-07-03 01:40) Reply(Locked)
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 4982 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#19316
I tried editing something in the old thread and now the poll is gone, and so are the results. >.> So sorry about that!

Here's the [url=http://famitracker.shoodot.net/forum/posts.php?id=2259]original post:

[quote=jrlepage]Since I wasn't able to create a poll in the original thread, I'll create it here instead. Vote away!

I don't think the results will mean much at the end of the day, it is still jsr's decision whether to release the feature to the public or not; but at least it'll make it clear how many are for it and how many are against it. Maybe if there's an overwhelming percentage of aye's it'll happen, who knows![/quote]

I encourage you to continue the discussion where it was left off. Again, I'm very sorry about this.

Posted: 2011-07-03 03:32 Reply(Locked)
TechEmporium

Avatar

Member for: 4485 days
Status: Offline

#19325
I posted back my original vote.

_______________________
Technology: the one thing that's hated & cursed at by all engineers, technologists, scientists & technicians!

(Lousy modern technology! )
Posted: 2011-07-03 03:45 Reply(Locked)
Im_a_Track_Man

Avatar

Member for: 4137 days
Location: Plantation, Florida
Status: Offline

#19326
AND AGAIN, without hesitation I re-cast my vote to have this implemented in a future release of FamiTracker, that is..., if HE feels like it

Posted: 2011-07-03 09:55 Reply(Locked)
DalekSam

Avatar

Member for: 4280 days
Location: United Kingdom, Belfast
Status: Offline

#19341
And once again, I say external application.

This means progress on FT isn't halted much and it can become its own tool. MEANING WE GET IT FASTER.

Posted: 2011-07-03 09:59 Reply(Locked)
InterrobangPie

Avatar

Member for: 4198 days
Location: England
Status: Offline

#19342
Actually I decided I don't give a shit.

_______________________
[quote=iGotno_scope]im going to continue making this crazy stuff then after a while my style will be so sick that you will be like damn suuun that shit is so sick i dont even get it. i will be like bro its ok.. you dont have to.[/quote]
Posted: 2011-07-03 10:11 Reply(Locked)
radel999



Member for: 4010 days
Status: Offline

#19344
Im vote for Yes

_______________________
Im radel999
Posted: 2011-07-03 13:47 Reply(Locked)
furrykef

Avatar

Member for: 5189 days
Status: Offline

#19348
What I'm hearing when I read this question is "Should a feature that's sure to be completely useless be added to FamiTracker?" In which case the answer is a clear 'no'.


Posted: 2011-07-03 14:24 Reply(Locked)
tadpole

Avatar

Member for: 5712 days
Location: Renton, WA, USA
Status: Offline

#19350
Useless how? I just spent an hour showing somebody how to do the instruments in Rygar, using nsf2midi+anvil studio. Would have taken 1 minute with this feature.

Haven't you ever wanted a certain sound but not been able to recreate it?

Posted: 2011-07-03 14:28 Reply(Locked)
psn

Avatar

Member for: 4321 days
Location: England
Status: Offline

#19351
[quote=DalekSam]And once again, I say external application.

This means progress on FT isn't halted much and it can become its own tool. MEANING WE GET IT FASTER.[/quote]
This.

Posted: 2011-07-03 16:33 Reply(Locked)
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 4982 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#19354
Wow, I didn't expect opinions to be so divergent.

I changed my vote with the new poll, to be honest. I went for yes/external app. That way it means FT progress doesn't necessarily get halted, and it also means someone else can do it if jsr decides not to.

As for those who consider the feature useless, well I am flummoxed... o.O

Posted: 2011-07-03 16:37 Reply(Locked)
rainwarrior

Avatar

Member for: 4150 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#19355
A no vote doesn't mean you think it's useless.

Posted: 2011-07-03 16:39 Reply(Locked)
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 4982 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#19356
[quote=rainwarrior]A no vote doesn't mean you think it's useless.[/quote]
Oh I wasn't implying that. Oh no. I was referring to furrykef's post, plus a couple other people I spoke to privately who told me more or less the same. :o

Posted: 2011-07-03 16:52 Reply(Locked)
Shiru



Member for: 4890 days
Location: Russia, Moscow
Status: Offline

#19357
My vote was 'No', but actually it means this:

No, I do not think this is a priority for now. It could be made a feature in a future release of Famitracker, *if it is already done by jsr, so he only need to include it into a release*. Otherwise, it could be made as an external application instead, *and anyone actually can do it right now or in the future*.


Posted: 2011-07-03 17:14 Reply(Locked)
danooct1

Avatar

Member for: 4851 days
Location: Dallas, TX
Status: Offline

#19358
shiru speaks wise words.

_______________________
NO LONGER BREAKIN THE LAW
Page 1 of 2 Sort: Goto Page: [1] [2] Next >>