Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /storage/content/49/145849/famitracker.com/public_html/forum/classes/dbHandler.php on line 29
[quote=nicetas_c]No, there are not enough variations in VRC7 channels.[/quote]
That's true. I haven't really thought of that (& it makes sense, seeing that you only have one custom instrument & 15 presets that could otherwise be done in the square channels).
But how about MMC5?
_______________________
Technology: the one thing that's hated & cursed at by all engineers, technologists, scientists & technicians!
The song's instrument and volume could be altered within the song itself, alleviating the added stress of constantly creating patches (not that doing that is bad or anything, but the possibilities of manipulation are infinite doing the 900BPM thing).
nicetas_c, you've made a 900BPM metroid out of me. ^____^ I finally understand how to create decent tracks more quickly (provided I set the lines up correct for guidance, that is).
_______________________
You now process Dracula's Rib. Good luck processing it...
[quote=80something]I'm sure this is a silly question but why 900 BPM? I guess you get more control over envelopes.. Is that it?[/quote]
There are only three factors affecting the outcome:
a) Volume
b) Pitch
c) Waveform
When the speed is set to 900BPM, there will be no need to use a real instrument; Just a blank one with the channel volume column, Vxxs and Pxxs are needed for anything, despite its big memory consumption. Esspecially when I have to open fx2 just for one P80...
surely you'd just use speed 1 instead? or is that what you mean?
(i try and avoid touching the tempo control as it can cause rhythm rounding problems - so i just mix speed commands to get the approximate speed i want.)