a lot of people are here to just to show off what they've made
jaxcheese wrote:
but if you're above taking advice
No im not, advice/cc about the song yes, but not how i make them. just because i want to use 3.8 for music is and he doesnt like it and tries to force me into a different, newer version is not advice.
jaxcheese wrote:
A forum is entirely based on replies, after all, so there's no reason to post something knowing that you're just going to ignore any replies
Have i been ignoring this thread? Or any of the replies that are actually about the song? scroll back, take a look and then try saying im ignoring the thread.
jaxcheese wrote:
because you're alright with everything the way it already is.
Im not allowed to be happy about what ive created? i guess its all a part of the NWO then. GG nsa, GG...
I don't appreciate you chopping up my reply and putting into a context that is different from what was intended, nor do I respect irrelevant government analogies; I'm not trying to promote an oppressive government by telling you how I feel about your behavior on a music forum.
If you're looking for advice on the song itself, you have to make it readily available for people to consume. I'll admit that when I'm looking through posts, I'm only going to pick up and listen to entries that I can enjoy as intended with a few clicks. I'm not saying that that's necessarily the right thing, but everyone is "guilty" of it, and if you're using an outdated version that no one else uses, the comments are going to be on that fact and not the song itself, because you've made it the most immediate and obstructive piece of information about your submission.
heyjoe asked you about detuned octaves and you didn't respond. Maybe it's because the post was lost in the flood of version-related arguments, though. Not accusing you of ignoring it because you didn't like it, but there aren't actually a lot of replies about the song itself (probably because it's hard for people to access it properly), and it makes you seem like you care a lot more about arguing your position than responding to famitracking queries.
_______________________
Fan of:
Cave Story, Mega Man X, MOTHER 3, Star Fox 64, Super Metroid, Shining Force.
Classic SEGA, Treasure, Square, Falcom.
Various roguelike RPGs and shmups/bullet hells.
I don't appreciate you chopping up my reply and putting into a context that is different from what was intended, nor do I respect irrelevant government analogies; I'm not trying to promote an oppressive government by telling you how I feel about your behavior on a music forum.
Fine, but this one will be chopped up (by paragraphs) anyway (because the paragraphs have different meanings).
jaxcheese wrote:
If you're looking for advice on the song itself, you have to make it readily available for people to consume. I'll admit that when I'm looking through posts, I'm only going to pick up and listen to entries that I can enjoy as intended with a few clicks. I'm not saying that that's necessarily the right thing, but everyone is "guilty" of it, and if you're using an outdated version that no one else uses, the comments are going to be on that fact and not the song itself, because you've made it the most immediate and obstructive piece of information about your submission.
Except there were alternative "not outdated" versions posted right at the first post.
jaxcheese wrote:
heyjoe asked you about detuned octaves and you didn't respond. Maybe it's because the post was lost in the flood of version-related arguments, though. Not accusing you of ignoring it because you didn't like it, but there aren't actually a lot of replies about the song itself (probably because it's hard for people to access it properly), and it makes you seem like you care a lot more about arguing your position than responding to famitracking queries.
I argue because people dont seem to get it: i dont want to change versions for making songs, even if i upconvert them and include them in the first post, there is always going to be that 3.8 version song there, first, foremost. And if i want to make it an option, no matter how redundant or outdated, it will be an option.
heres the post you didnt see (attachment not included):
Turbonaator wrote:
heyjoe07 wrote:
Hello
i 've listened to the first one for now , i like it, but i have question, the frame 11 and after got pulse 1 and 2 -2a03- with P83 when you go an octave up and it's out of tune, was it on purpose ?
Gonna check the others
yes, square 1 & 2 are out of tune by the p83 on purpose, it just shows more on higher octaves and less on lower ones. i dont know why, but thats how it is. Same thing with note bending - the speed of the bends and the amount of notes it goes through when bending notes is bigger on higher octaves than on lower ones. I've included an example which hopefully demonstrates this (bending).
Alright, you've made your point and I've made mine, I suppose. Sorry to have stirred up trouble.
_______________________
Fan of:
Cave Story, Mega Man X, MOTHER 3, Star Fox 64, Super Metroid, Shining Force.
Classic SEGA, Treasure, Square, Falcom.
Various roguelike RPGs and shmups/bullet hells.
