Login:
Menu:
Post: Author:
FamiTracker > General > Show Off Your Work > N163 MEGAMIX; Limited space left Owner: sparkyrogers New post
Page 8 of 15 Sort: Goto Page: << Previous [1] [2] [3] ... [7] [8] [9] ... [13] [14] [15] Next >>
Posted: 2014-06-28 04:12 Reply | Quote
Im_a_Track_Man

Avatar

Member for: 5693 days
Location: Plantation, Florida
Status: Offline

#58794
>76 frames
Holy shit.

Zaalan3 wrote:
I hope this is getting a hardware recording...

While not entirely real hardware, my PowerPak is having fun with this.

Posted: 2014-06-28 05:29 Reply | Quote
Glitch_King

Avatar

Member for: 5282 days
Location: California
Status: Offline

#58796
sparkyrogers wrote:
VinylScratch wrote:
TEHMEGAMASTAH wrote:
I'm guessing we're getting kind of close to the end of the song.
It seems like it, but may I remind you that these people still haven't contributed anything into this mix:
CaptainSwag101
Storm
Golden Shower
Glich_King
Bari10
Turbonaator
Milos
Vulpatrino

I don't know how many of these people are still in, but that's part of why I suggested we half the speed, so that the frames last longer and we can leave room for others. I didn't necessarily mean that we should slow down the song (but anyone can do that if they want to) but we should half the speed, because we really don't need all that row space unless someone is trying to do some sort of arpeggio.


I see what you're saying.


Sorry, my internet went out for a couple of days, but im seeing wat i can do for my contribution in this

_______________________
Some other sites I have made shelter on...
Ye Youtube
Ye Chipmusic
Ye BotB
Posted: 2014-06-28 05:44 Reply | Quote
GoldenShower



Member for: 5012 days
Status: Offline

#58797
Is someone doing build right now? I'd like to squeeze in.

Posted: 2014-06-28 06:37  (Last Edited: 2014-06-28 06:38) Reply | Quote
Glitch_King

Avatar

Member for: 5282 days
Location: California
Status: Offline

#58800
sorry for vomiting on this

_______________________
Some other sites I have made shelter on...
Ye Youtube
Ye Chipmusic
Ye BotB
Posted: 2014-06-28 07:00 Reply | Quote
DjJizzer5

Avatar

Member for: 5493 days
Status: Offline

#58801
so, no lower speed.... 91 frames.

Posted: 2014-06-28 07:40  (Last Edited: 2014-06-28 07:46) Reply | Quote
Milos

Avatar

Member for: 5355 days
Location: Poland
Status: Offline

#58802
1 hour...
He posted this 1 fricking hour before I was gonna post mine...
Seriously, Glitch...


Attachments:
fuck_you.ftm (178 Kb)
Posted: 2014-06-28 07:47 Reply | Quote
sparkyrogers

Avatar

Member for: 4624 days
Status: Offline

#58803
DjJizzer5 wrote:
so, no lower speed.... 91 frames.

GEH-!!

Well, look on the bright side... isn't the max 128... wait..
that IS almost 128....

Damn... if we don't slow down, guys, we'll have to call it a mix and end it.

Posted: 2014-06-28 07:48 Reply | Quote
sparkyrogers

Avatar

Member for: 4624 days
Status: Offline

#58804
Milos wrote:
1 hour...
He posted this 1 fricking hour before I was gonna post mine...
Seriously, Glitch...


This is what I was trying to prevent.... :C

Posted: 2014-06-28 07:51 Reply | Quote
Milos

Avatar

Member for: 5355 days
Location: Poland
Status: Offline

#58805
sparkyrogers wrote:
Milos wrote:
1 hour...
He posted this 1 fricking hour before I was gonna post mine...
Seriously, Glitch...


This is what I was trying to prevent.... :C


Yeah, now I just can't clean up his vomit because of this...
Fuck fucking fuck.

Posted: 2014-06-28 07:57 Reply | Quote
Zaalan3

Avatar

Member for: 4728 days
Location: Nebraska
Status: Offline

#58806
This is getting out of control...

IT'S NOT OVER YET Posted: 2014-06-28 07:58  (Last Edited: 2014-06-28 07:58) Reply | Quote
GoldenShower



Member for: 5012 days
Status: Offline

#58807
There is one possibility. Increasing number of rows per frame from 64 to 128, resulting in longer frames, thus halving the overall number of frames. Just need to copy-paste data from each frame to previous frame. I can do that

Posted: 2014-06-28 08:02 Reply | Quote
sparkyrogers

Avatar

Member for: 4624 days
Status: Offline

#58808
Milos wrote:
sparkyrogers wrote:
Milos wrote:
1 hour...
He posted this 1 fricking hour before I was gonna post mine...
Seriously, Glitch...


This is what I was trying to prevent.... :C


Yeah, now I just can't clean up his vomit because of this...
Fuck fucking fuck.


This is quite the predicament. I feel like your part deserves to be put in, since you began work on it first and Glitch King didn't announce that he was going to post a build. Do you still have the ftm of the entire song with your contribution?

Posted: 2014-06-28 08:03  (Last Edited: 2014-06-28 08:05) Reply | Quote
Milos

Avatar

Member for: 5355 days
Location: Poland
Status: Offline

#58809
Yup. Here it is.
I'm thinking about moving every frame to 128 instead of 64, btw.


Attachments:
n163_mm_build_15_chipjockey.ftm (179 Kb)
RE: IT'S NOT OVER YET Posted: 2014-06-28 08:03 Reply | Quote
sparkyrogers

Avatar

Member for: 4624 days
Status: Offline

#58810
GoldenShower wrote:
There is one possibility. Increasing number of rows per frame from 64 to 128, resulting in longer frames, thus halving the overall number of frames. Just need to copy-paste data from each frame to previous frame. I can do that


That would help. But just wait until we have the whole situation with Milos' part straightened out, OK?

Posted: 2014-06-28 08:05 Reply | Quote
sparkyrogers

Avatar

Member for: 4624 days
Status: Offline

#58811
Milos wrote:
Yup. Here it is.


Alright, everyone. I feel that Milos' part should be in the mix and that Glitch King's part should be omitted. Is there anyone against this decision?

Page 8 of 15 Sort: Goto Page: << Previous [1] [2] [3] ... [7] [8] [9] ... [13] [14] [15] Next >>