Green Hill Zone (Yet again) Posted: 2011-02-24 20:53 (Last Edited: 2011-06-12 16:30 )
Reply |
Quote
MovieMovies1 #13466
Some random 900bpm stuff.
Posted: 2011-02-24 21:03 (Last Edited: 2012-10-25 07:03 )
Reply |
Quote
gyms #13467
Fx3 #13490
- Yes, nice, but I have a few things: a) why so much vibrato? b) looks like square 2 should have a lower volume level.
MovieMovies1 #13517
A) The original song had vibrato on the lead
TechEmporium #13612
It didn't have that much vibrato & the lead's intro frame didn't have the amount of tremolo that you put in with that note alternation.
_______________________
kinkinkijkin #13613
If this was a cover, doesn't sound like it. Sounds way too good to be a cover.
InterrobangPie #13614
And I thought I went overboard with the vibratos...
_______________________iGotno_scope wrote:
im going to continue making this crazy stuff then after a while my style will be so sick that you will be like damn suuun that shit is so sick i dont even get it. i will be like bro its ok.. you dont have to.
TechEmporium #13621
kinkinkijkin wrote:
If this was a cover, doesn't sound like it. Sounds way too good to be a cover.
_______________________
kinkinkijkin #13623
TechEmporium wrote:
kinkinkijkin wrote:
If this was a cover, doesn't sound like it. Sounds way too good to be a cover.
Actually, it could use vibrato like that; it's only the song that he's covering didn't use so much.
MovieMovies1 #13635
I wanted to do the vibrato like that, because I wanted it to be a little different vibrato style.
TechEmporium #13637
Yes; but at least don't decrease the pitch so low when you do that.
_______________________
kinkinkijkin #13638
It sounded more like an over then back than an over then under vibrato to me.
Posted: 2011-02-27 01:44 (Last Edited: 2012-10-25 07:03 )
Reply |
Quote
gyms #13639
kinkinkijkin #13640
.....stupid dude wrote:
You added r's accidentally.
Posted: 2011-02-27 02:27 (Last Edited: 2012-10-25 07:03 )
Reply |
Quote
gyms #13642
) 
