I am gravely sorry for this injustice. I will make sure to never use the instrument editor, and design my own version of an NES board and make an edit to Famitracker to allow me to output in stereo.
wut. what i said has nothing to do with it being "real"(?) or not.
the song's more like 180 BPM (without tempo tapping it.) BPM is a perceptive measurement you make from listening to a song and calculating the emphasized beats, NOT an absolute value that your music software shows you. if you write with the tempo meter at 900 BPM and are only putting a strong downbeat at the start of every four "bars", it isn't 900 BPM.
i feel like i'm stating the obvious but on these forums you never know.
anyway the cover is good and totally real NES music.
You don't have to explain the concept behind beats per minute to me, I merely called it a 900BPM cover because nicetas has started that trend when tracking with one frame per row.
wut. what i said has nothing to do with it being "real"(?) or not.
the song's more like 180 BPM (without tempo tapping it.) BPM is a perceptive measurement you make from listening to a song and calculating the emphasized beats, NOT an absolute value that your music software shows you. if you write with the tempo meter at 900 BPM and are only putting a strong downbeat at the start of every four "bars", it isn't 900 BPM.
i feel like i'm stating the obvious but on these forums you never know.
anyway the cover is good and totally real NES music.
I am disappoint. :p
That was a reference to an image YOU posted to the VGMusic forums once, which sadly I wasn't able to locate.
i know the one, but i don't see how it pertains to anything here.
danooct1 wrote:
You don't have to explain the concept behind beats per minute to me, I merely called it a 900BPM cover because nicetas has started that trend when tracking with one frame per row.
.png){kind=avatar}
